Episiotomy practices in France: epidemiology and risk factors in non-operative vaginal deliveries.

Episiotomy use has decreased due to the lack of evidence on its protective effects from maternal obstetric anal sphincter injuries. Indications for episiotomy vary considerably and there are a great variety of factors associated with its use. The aim of this article is to describe the episiotomy rate in France between 2013 and 2017 and the factors associated with its use in non-operative vaginal deliveries. In this retrospective population-based cohort study, we included vaginal deliveries performed in French hospitals (N = 584) and for which parity was coded. The variable of interest was the rate of episiotomy, particularly for non-operative vaginal deliveries. Trends in the episiotomy rates were studied using the Cochran-Armitage test. Hierarchical logistic regression was used to identify variables associated with episiotomy according to maternal age and parity. Between 2013 and 2017, French episiotomy rates fell from 21.6 to 14.3% for all vaginal deliveries (p < 0.01), and from 15.5 to 9.3% (p < 0.01) for all non-operative vaginal deliveries. Among non-operative vaginal deliveries, epidural analgesia, non-reassuring fetal heart rate, meconium in the amniotic fluid, shoulder dystocia, and newborn weight (≥ 4,000 g) were risk factors for episiotomy, both for nulliparous and multiparous women. On the contrary, prematurity reduced the risk of its use. For nulliparous women, breech presentation was also a risk factor for episiotomy, and for multiparous women, scarred uterus and multiple pregnancies were risk factors. In France, despite a reduction in episiotomy use over the last few years, the factors associated with episiotomy have not changed and are similar to the literature. This suggests that the decrease in episiotomies in France is an overall tendency which is probably related to improved care strategies that have been relayed by hospital teams and perinatal networks.

Factors related to episiotomy practice: an evidence-based medicine systematic review.

Episiotomy practice is influenced by many factors studied in the scientific literature. Evidence-based medicine has isolated many factors that are linked to episiotomy practice, thus creating a need to group all these factors to create a relevant and useful database for scientific research. Based on the PRISMA methodology, the authors conducted a systematic literature review with the aim of covering this very need. Using 12 French and English combinations of relevant keywords, 15 databases containing publications published between 2008 and 2018 were evaluated. A total of 63 articles were identified, grouped and categorised into four main themes in the results section: (1) Individual and clinical factors related to the mother, (2) individual and clinical factors related to the child, (3) technical factors, and (4) organisation of health care and professional factors (institutional, organisational, personal and professional factors). These factors are then presented in terms of their impact on the practice of episiotomy. Then the future implications of this study on scientific research and clinical practice are discussed.

Birth-Related Perineal Trauma in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Introduction Birth-related perineal trauma (BPT) is a common consequence of vaginal births. When poorly managed, BPT can result in increased morbidity and mortality due to infections, haemorrhage, and incontinence. This review aims to collect data on rates of BPT in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), through a systematic review and meta-analysis. Methods The following databases were searched: Medline, Embase, Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences Literature (LILACs), and the World Health Organization (WHO) regional databases, from 2004 to 2016. Cross-sectional data on the proportion of vaginal births that resulted in episiotomy, second degree tears or obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASI) were extracted from studies carried out in LMICs by two independent reviewers. Estimates were meta-analysed using a random effects model; results were presented by type of BPT, parity, and mode of birth. Results Of the 1182 citations reviewed, 74 studies providing data on 334,054 births in 41 countries were included. Five studies reported outcomes of births in the community. In LMICs, the overall rates of BPT were 46% (95% CI 36-55%), 24% (95% CI 17-32%), and 1.4% (95% CI 1.2-1.7%) for episiotomies, second degree tears, and OASI, respectively. Studies were highly heterogeneous with respect to study design and population. The overall reporting quality was inadequate. Discussion Compared to high-income settings, episiotomy rates are high in LMIC medical facilities. There is an urgent need to improve reporting of BPT in LMICs particularly with regards to births taking in community settings.

A multicenter cross-sectional study of episiotomy practice in Romania.

RATIONALE, AIMS, AND OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to focus attention on episiotomy practice in Romanian maternity units in order to identify factors associated with the very high rate of the procedure in Romania and to consider strategies to reduce it. METHODS: In this clustered cross-sectional study, a total of 11 863 patients were recorded in eight Romanian maternity units to assess the prevalence of episiotomy. A random effects Poisson model was used to estimate the prevalence rate in univariate and multivariate models. RESULTS: Among the 11 863 patients included for analysis, 8475 (71.4%) had an episiotomy. The prevalence of episiotomy was 92.7% for the first vaginal birth, 73.2% for the second vaginal birth, and 35% for the third vaginal birth. The overall rate of suturing was higher than the episiotomy rate for all patients (total rate 79.2%). The likelihood of exiting the maternity ward with an intact perineum after the first vaginal birth was less than 5% at the first vaginal birth. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, routine episiotomy is the norm in Romanian maternity units, with episiotomy rates among the highest in Europe. Episiotomy use is mainly driven by local professional norms, experiences, previous training, and practitioners' decisions rather than evidence, guidelines, or variations in patient needs at the time of vaginal birth.

Efectos de la episiotomía sobre las lesiones obstétricas del esfínter anal. Una revisión bibliográfica / Effects of episiotomy on obstetric lesions of the anal sphincter. A bibliographic review

Las lesiones obstétricas del esfínter, son una fuente importante de morbilidad en la población obstétrica ya que más de la mitad de las afectadas reportan incontinencia anal a largo plazo. Objetivo: Determinar los efectos de la episiotomía sobre las lesiones obstétricas del esfínter anal. Material y métodos: Para la realización de esta revisión, se realizó una búsqueda en abril de 2017 en las bases de datos de Medline y Scopus, utilizando como descriptor Mesh el término «episiotomy» y como palabras clave «obstetric anal sphincter injury». Resultados: Se obtuvieron un total de 23 y 91 resultados en Medline y Scopus respectivamente, y tras aplicar los criterios de inclusión y exclusión se seleccionaron 3 artículos de Medline y 12 de Scopus. Discusión: Se analizaron los resultados obtenidos en función del tipo de estudio, tamaño muestral, tipo de episiotomía utilizado y el protocolo de uso de la misma que realizan, ya sea liberal o restrictivo, criterios de inclusión y exclusión aplicados en los estudios y las características obstétricas, demográficas y maternas recogidas entre las cuales se encuentran el tipo de parto, la edad gestacional y materna, la etnia, la paridad, el uso de epidural, una duración de la segunda etapa del parto, el IMC materno y el tamaño fetal. Conclusiones: La episiotomía parece perfilarse como un factor protector de las lesiones obstétricas del esfínter anal

Obstetric sphincter injuries are a significant source of morbidity in the obstetrics population, as more than half of those affected report long-term anal incontinence. Objective: To determine the effects of episiotomy on obstetric lesions of the anal sphincter. Material and methods: In order to perform this review, a search made in April 2017 in the Medline and Scopus databases, using "episiotomy" as the Mesh descriptor, and the words, "obstetric anal sphincter injury". Results: A total of 23 and 91 results were obtained in Medline and Scopus, respectively, and after applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 3 Medline and 12 Scopus articles were selected. Discussion: The results were analysed according to the type of study, sample size, type of episiotomy performed and the protocol used for it, whether liberal or restrictive. Inclusion and exclusion criteria applied in studies, and the obstetric, demographic and maternal characteristics, including type of delivery, gestational and maternal age, ethnicity, parity, epidural type, the duration of the second stage of labour, maternal and foetal size. Conclusions: Episiotomy seems to be a protective factor for obstetric lesions of the anal sphincter

How did episiotomy rates change from 2007 to 2014? Population-based study in France.

BACKGROUND: Since the 2000s, selective episiotomy has been systematically recommended worldwide. In France, the recommended episiotomy rate in vaginal deliveries is less than 30%. The aims of this study were to describe the evolution of episiotomy rates between 2007 and 2014, especially for vaginal deliveries without instrumental assistance and to assess individual characteristics and birth environment factors associated with episiotomy. METHODS: This population-based study included all hospital discharge abstracts for all deliveries in France from 2007 to 2014. The use of episiotomy in vaginal deliveries was identified by one code in the French Common Classification of Medical Procedures. The episiotomy rate per department and its evolution is described from 2007 to 2014. A mixed model was used to assess associations with episiotomy for non-operative vaginal deliveries and the risk factors related to the women's characteristics and the birth environment. RESULTS: There were approximately 540,000 non-operative vaginal deliveries per year, in the study period. The national episiotomy rate for vaginal deliveries overall significantly decreased from 26.7% in 2007 to 19.9% in 2014. For non-operative deliveries, this rate fell from 21.1% to 14.1%. For the latter, the use of episiotomy was significantly associated with breech vaginal delivery (aOR = 1.27 [1.23-1.30]), epidural analgesia (aOR = 1.45 [1.43-1.47]), non-reassuring fetal heart rate (aOR = 1.47 [1.47-1.49]), and giving birth for the first time (aOR = 3.85 [3.84-4.00]). CONCLUSIONS: The episiotomy rate decreased throughout France, for vaginal deliveries overall and for non-operative vaginal deliveries. This decrease is probably due to proactive changes in practices to restrict the number of episiotomies, which should be performed only if beneficial to the mother and the infant.

Statistical trends of episiotomy around the world: Comparative systematic review of changing practices.

The authors' purpose for this article is to identify, review and interpret all publications about the episiotomy rates worldwide. Based on the criteria from the PRISMA guidelines, twenty databases were scrutinized. All studies which include national statistics related to episiotomy were selected, as well as studies presenting estimated data. Sixty-one papers were selected with publication dates between 1995 and 2016. A static and dynamic analysis of all the results was carried out. The assumption for the decline in the number of episiotomies is discussed and confirmed, recalling that nowadays high rates of episiotomy remain in less industrialized countries and East Asia. Finally, our analysis aims to investigate the potential determinants which influence apparent statistical disparities.

Risk and protective factors for obstetric anal sphincter injuries: A retrospective nationwide study.

BACKGROUND: In view of the reported increase in obstetric anal sphincter injuries, the objective of this study was to evaluate the incidence of such injuries over time and the associated risk and protective factors. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study from a national database of 168 137 primiparous women with term, singleton, cephalic, vaginal delivery between 2008 and 2014. The main outcome measure was obstetric anal sphincter injury. A multivariate regression model was used to identify risk and protective factors. RESULTS: Age >19 years, birthweight >4000 g, and operative vaginal delivery were independent risk factors for obstetric anal sphincter injuries. Mediolateral episiotomy increased the risk for obstetric anal sphincter injuries in spontaneous vaginal birth (number needed to harm 333), whereas it was protective in vacuum delivery (number needed to treat 50). From 2008 to 2014, there was an increase in the rate of obstetric anal sphincter injuries (2.1% vs 3.1%, P < .01), vacuum deliveries (12.1% vs 12.8%, P < .01), and cesarean delivery after labor (17.1% vs 19.4%, P < .01), while forceps deliveries (0.4% vs 0.1%, P < .01) and episiotomy rate decreased (35.9% vs 26.4%, P < .01). CONCLUSIONS: Episiotomy may be a risk or protective factor depending on the type of episiotomy and the clinical setting in which it is used. Our study supports a restrictive use of mediolateral episiotomy in spontaneous vaginal deliveries. In vacuum deliveries mediolateral episiotomy may help prevent obstetric anal sphincter injuries.

Association Between Senior Obstetrician Supervision of Resident Deliveries and Mode of Delivery.

OBJECTIVE: In December 2012, the Mount Sinai Hospital implemented a program to have senior obstetricians (more than 20 years of experience) supervise residents on labor and delivery during the daytime. The objective of this study was to estimate the association of resident supervision by senior obstetricians with mode of delivery. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of all resident deliveries at Mount Sinai from July 2011 to June 2015. We included all patients with live, term, singleton, vertex fetuses. We compared delivery outcomes between patients delivered before December 2012 and patients delivered December 2012 and later using logistic regression analysis to control for age, body mass index, parity, induction, and prior cesarean delivery. During the study period there were no other specific departmental initiatives to increase forceps deliveries aside from having six obstetricians with significant experience in operative deliveries supervise and teach residents on labor and delivery. RESULTS: There were 5,201 live, term, singleton, vertex deliveries under the care of residents, 1,919 (36.9%) before December 2012 and 3,282 (63.1%) December 2012 or later. The rate of forceps deliveries significantly increased from 0.6% to 2.6% (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 8.44, 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.1-23.1), and the rate of cesarean deliveries significantly decreased from 27.3% to 24.5% (adjusted OR 0.68, 95% CI 0.55-0.83). There were no statistically significant differences in the rates of third- or fourth-degree lacerations or 5-minute Apgar scores less than 7. Among nulliparous women, the forceps rate increased from 1.0% to 3.4% (adjusted OR 4.87, 95% CI 1.74-13.63) and the cesarean delivery rate decreased from 25.6% to 22.7% (adjusted OR 0.69, 95% CI 0.53-0.89). The increase in forceps deliveries and the decrease in cesarean deliveries were seen only in daytime hours (7 AM to 7 PM), that is, the shift that was covered by senior obstetricians. CONCLUSION: Having senior obstetricians supervise resident deliveries is significantly associated with an increased rate of forceps deliveries and a decreased rate of cesarean deliveries.

Can major systematic reviews influence practice patterns? A case study of episiotomy trends.

PURPOSE: Episiotomy is one of the most commonly performed procedures among women of childbearing age in the United States. In 2005, a major systematic review conducted by Hartmann and colleagues recommended against routine use of episiotomy and was widely covered in the media. We assessed the impact of the Hartman et al. study on episiotomy trend. METHODS: Based on 100% hospital discharge data from eight states in 2003-2008, we used interrupted time series regression models to estimate the impact of the Hartman et al. review on episiotomy rates. We used mixed-effects regression models to assess whether interhospital variation was reduced over time. RESULTS: After controlling for underlying trend, episiotomy rates dropped by 1.4 percentage points after Hartman et al. publication (p < 0.01 for spontaneous delivery; p < 0.1 for operative delivery). The publication has smaller effect on government hospitals as compared to private hospitals. Mixed effects models estimated negative correlation between cross-time and cross-hospital variations in episiotomy rates, indicating reduced cross-hospital variation over time. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggested that there has been a gradual decline in episiotomy rates over the period 2003-2008, and that synthesis of evidence showing harms from routine episiotomy had limited impact on practice patterns in the case of episiotomy. The experience of episiotomy illustrates the challenge of using comparative effectiveness and evidenced-based medicine to reduce use of unnecessary procedures.

Episiotomy: the final cut?

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether episiotomy prevents 3rd or 4th degree perineal tears in critical conditions such as shoulder dystocia, instrumental deliveries (vacuum or forceps), persistent occiput-posterior position, fetal macrosomia (>4,000 g), and non-reassuring fetal heart rate (NRFHR) patterns. METHODS: A retrospective study comparing 3rd and 4th degree perineal tears during vaginal deliveries with or without episiotomy, in selected critical conditions was performed. Multiple gestations, preterm deliveries (<37 weeks' gestation) and cesarean deliveries were excluded from the analysis. Stratified analysis (using the Mantel-Haenszel technique) was used to obtain the weighted odds ratio (OR), while controlling for these variables. RESULTS: During the study period, there were 168,077 singleton vaginal deliveries. Of those, 188 (0.1%) had 3rd or 4th degree perineal tears. Vaginal deliveries with episiotomy had statistically significant higher rates of 3rd or 4th degree perineal tears than those without episiotomy (0.2 vs. 0.1%; P<0.001). The association between episiotomy and severe perineal tears remained significant even in the critical conditions. Stratified analysis revealed that the adjusted ORs for 3rd or 4th degree perineal tears in these critical conditions (Macrosomia OR=2.3; instrumental deliveries OR=1.8; NRFHR patterns OR=2.1; occipito-posterior position OR=2.3; and shoulder dystocia OR=2.3) were similar to the crude OR (OR=2.3). CONCLUSIONS: Mediolateral episiotomy is an independent risk factor for 3rd or 4th degree perineal tears, even in critical conditions such as shoulder dystocia, instrumental deliveries, occiput-posterior position, fetal macrosomia, and NRFHR. Prophylactic use of episiotomy in these conditions does not seem beneficial if performed to prevent 3rd or 4th degree perineal tears.

Lower reproductive tract fistula repairs in inpatient US women, 1979-2006.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: The objective of the study was to characterize trends in lower reproductive tract fistula (LRTF) repair in inpatient US women from 1979 to 2006. METHODS: Retrospective data was obtained from the National Hospital Discharge Survey regarding LRTF diagnoses, demographics, comorbidities, and fistula repair procedures, using ICD-9-CM diagnostic and procedure codes. Age-adjusted rates (AARs) were calculated using 1990 census data. Trends in LRTF surgical repair were evaluated using regression analysis. RESULTS: Between 1979 and 2006, the AAR of LRTF repair declined from 7.8 to 4.8 per 100,000 women (b = -2.97, p < 0.001). The most common surgical fistula repairs were rectovaginal, vesicovaginal, and colovaginal. The AARs of colovaginal and vesicovaginal fistula repair remained stable, while the AAR of rectovaginal fistula repair declined. CONCLUSIONS: The AAR of inpatient LRTF repair declined between 1979 and 2006, perhaps reflecting a concurrent decrease in obstetric trauma, in the context of decreasing episiotomy and operative vaginal delivery and increasing cesarean section rates.

Trends and determinants of episiotomy at the University of Nigeria Teaching Hospital (Unth), Enugu, Nigeria.

BACKGROUND: Episiotomy is the most commonly performed obstetric procedure. The indications and efficacy are poorly established and its practice has remained controversial. OBJECTIVE: To determine the rate and the determinants of episiotomy in the parturients at the UNTH, Enugu. METHODS: A five year retrospective review of episiotomy at UNTH Enugu between 1st January, 2000 and 31st December, 2004. RESULTS: Out of 3032 vaginal deliveries, 1201 women had episiotomy during vaginal delivery, giving a rate of 39.6%. The rate fluctuated between 38.7% in 2000 to 32.7% in 2004. The risk of receiving episiotomy is significantly higher among primigravidae than multigravidae [OR = 10.92, (95% CI = 8.98,13.28)]. Similarly, macrosomia (birth weight > 4 kg) significantly increases the risk of episiotomy [OR = 0.096, (95% CI = 0.06, 0.15)]. Women who had instrumental or destructive vaginal delivery are significantly more likely to receive episiotomy than those who had spontaneous vaginal delivery [OR = 0.13 (95% CI = 0.07, 0.26)]. The postpartum blood loss is significantly higher among women that received episiotomy than those who did not [t = 42.161, P > 0.0001]. CONCLUSIONS: The rate of episiotomy in UNTH, Enugu is high. Primigravidity, macrosomia and instrumental deliveries are factors associated with increased risk of episiotomy. Knowledge of these risk factors will guide in predicting episiotomy among paturients in labour ward.

Importancia del ángulo de la episiotomía / Significance of the angle of episiotomy

La metodología de los estudios que evalúan el papel de la episiotomía mediolateral carece de la calidad necesaria y no puede extraerse actualmente de ellos conclusión alguna acerca del traumatismo perineal grave y la incontinencia anal. Se identificaron cuatro problemas: la definición y la ejecución práctica de la episiotomía mediolateral, y el diagnóstico y clasificación del traumatismo perineal. La definición y ejecución de la episiotomía mediolateral difieren ampliamente entre las distintas instituciones y los distintos individuos. El problema principal es la precisión de la dirección elegida. Se introdujeron tres términos: ángulo de incisión, de sutura y de cicatrización de episiotomía. Anteriormente, la episiotomía mediolateral se definía por un ángulo de incisión mínimo de 40°. Sin embargo,cuando se incide a 40°, el ángulo mediano luego de la reparación era de 20°, mientras que el ángulo de cicatrización era de 30° en los casos de desgarros de tercer grado frente a 38° en los controles. Al usar un ángulo de incisión de 60°, el ángulo mediano de sutura fue de 45° y el de cicatrización de 48°. Actualmente se propone que la episiotomía mediolateral se defina como “una incisión en el perineo durante la última parte de la segunda etapa del trabajo de parto, que comienza en el perineo medial pero se dirige lateralmente en un ángulo de al menos 60° en dirección de la tuberosidad isquial”. Se requieren más investigaciones para evaluar la seguridad de este ángulo de incisión.

A population-based register study to determine indications for episiotomy in Finland.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether there is a shift in the episiotomy target group from women at low risk to those at high risk of obstetric anal sphincter injuries, concomitant with a decrease in the use of episiotomy. METHODS: A population-based register of 514,741 women with singleton vaginal deliveries recorded in the Finnish Medical Birth Register was reviewed. Primiparous and multiparous women with episiotomy were compared to women without episiotomy for possible risk factors via stepwise logistic regression analysis. The prevalence and risk of episiotomy were evaluated over 5 time periods from 1997 to 2007. RESULTS: The occurrence of episiotomy decreased from 71.5% in 1997-1999 to 54.9% in 2006-2007 among primiparous women, and from 21.5% in 1997-2001 to 9.2% in 2006-2007 among multiparous women. The use of episiotomy decreased in not only low-risk but also high-risk women who had operative vaginal or breech deliveries, macrosomic newborns, and oxytocin augmentation. The ratio of episiotomy use remained relatively unchanged in different subgroups even though episiotomy policy became increasingly restrictive over time. CONCLUSIONS: The spectrum of episiotomy indications has not changed over time, and use of episiotomy has declined arbitrarily to a similar extent among high- and low-risk women.

Trends over time with commonly performed obstetric and gynecologic inpatient procedures.

OBJECTIVES: To estimate trends over time in inpatient obstetric and gynecologic surgical procedures, and to estimate commonly performed obstetric and gynecologic surgical procedures across a woman's lifespan. METHODS: Data were collected for procedures in adult women from 1979 to 2006 using the National Hospital Discharge Survey, a federal discharge dataset of U.S. inpatient hospitals, including patient and hospital demographics and International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision, Clinical Modification procedure codes for adult women from 1979 to 2006. Age-adjusted rates per 1,000 women were created using 1990 U.S. Census data. Procedural trends over time were assessed. RESULTS: More than 137 million obstetric and gynecologic procedures were performed, comprising 26.5% of surgical procedures for adult women. Sixty-four percent were only obstetric and 29% were only gynecologic, with 7% of women undergoing both obstetric and gynecologic procedures during the same hospitalization. Obstetric and gynecologic procedures decreased from approximately 5,351,000 in 1979 to 4,949,000 in 2006. Both operative vaginal delivery and episiotomy rates decreased, whereas spontaneous vaginal delivery and cesarean delivery rates increased. All gynecologic procedure rates decreased during the study period, with the exception of incontinence procedures, which increased. Common procedures by age group differed across a woman's lifetime. CONCLUSION: Inpatient obstetric and gynecologic procedures rates decreased from 1979 to 2006. Inpatient obstetric and gynecologic procedure rates are decreasing over time but still comprise a large proportion of inpatient surgical procedures for U.S. women. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Episiotomia: revendo conceitos / Episiotomy: concepts review

A episiotomia ainda é o procedimento cirúrgico mais utilizado em obstetrícia. Seu uso rotineiro pode levar a uma série de complicações, dentre as quais se destacam: infecção, hematoma, rotura de períneo de terceiro e quarto graus, dispareunia e lesão do nervo pudendo. Este artigo é uma revisão de literatura que aborda o histórico, as indicações, as complicações, os motivos que ainda incentivam sua prática rotineira e os custos envolvidos na episiotomia. Foram utilizadas as bases de dados da Medline, Lilacs, Pubmed e Biblioteca Cochrane. Embora as evidências científicas indiquem que o uso restrito da episiotomia deva ser incorporado em todos os serviços, na América Latina verificamos que sua utilização é muito elevada, podendo atingir taxas de até 90 porcento. Sugerimos que as instituições hospitalares realizam treinamentos e atualizações acerca das diretrizes baseadas em evidências na obstetrícia.

Episiotomy is still the most widely used surgical procedure in obstetrician. Its frequent use may cause complications such as infection, 3rd and 4th grades of perineal lacerations, dyspaurenia and pudendal nerve injury. This paper is a literature review that comprises history, indications, complications, reasons that encourage the routine practice and costs implicated in episiotomy. Medline, Lilacs, Pubmed and Cochrane Library were used as databases. Although evidences suggest that restrictive use of episiotomy may be part of obstetrical care, in the Latin America its use is very common and may reach rates of up to 90 percent. It is suggested that hospital institutions should provide updating about obstetrics evidence based guidelines.